The concept of entropy is one of the most useful terms for understanding just about everything. While it has its origins in natural law – thermodynamics, specifically – the concept holds true pretty much across all closed systems.
In the simplest of terms, every closed system will ultimately degrade toward a state of maximum entropy. I’ll use the current political system of the U.S. as a convenient example. When American democracy was first shoved out of the nest by the founding fathers, it was new, fresh, and energetic. It took the world’s breath away at its boldness and unlimited promise, and set the wheels turning on tangible change across much of the world.
Before the ink dried on the Constitution, however, the degradation began. From the beginning, the country’s political operations fell into the hands of a strictly limited number of parties, which quickly coalesced into just two. Since then, they have essentially shared power, with only minor differences in policies between the two. Simply, absent a disruptive external force, the closed political system quickly matured into an institutionalized “sameness” that all but assures no serious challenges – leading, ultimately, to the certainty it will degrade to only a shell of its former self.
It was, perhaps, because of his own understanding of natural law that Thomas Jefferson was heard to remark, “The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure.”
That doesn’t mean I am advocating revolution, dear reader – just pointing out the fact that any closed system, no matter how well constructed, will degrade. To expect the United States of America to avoid this fate is to expect the impossible. Switching to a corporate example, I used to be a regular buyer of Toyota cars. They were well made, innovative, and suited my changing needs over the years. And I wasn’t alone – in 2007 they became the world’s largest automobile maker, with a global manufacturing and distribution system that made them appear dominant. Behind the scenes, though, entropy was at work.
In 2008, when the time had come to lease a new car, I reflexively headed over to the local dealer fully expecting to drive off with yet another Toyota, just as I had done several times over the previous decade or more. But as I walked around the showroom, it was impossible not to notice that the company had lost its edge. The cars on offer were not only more expensive than the competition, but even the newest models had that “so yesterday” look about them.
As I said at the onset, you can see entropy at work in virtually every closed system. Consider the U.S. dollar, which became the world’s de facto reserve currency as a result of Bretton Woods. What an amazing advantage for the United States – this unique ability to provide the world’s central banks with their primary reserve component! And to have all the world’s commodities dealt in dollars. In short, the dollar became the centerpiece of the global economic system.
It was, of course, damned to entropy, with Nixon’s ending the dollar’s gold backing just being part of the natural progression. And if he hadn’t done it, one of his successors would have – due to some “emergency” or as a “temporary” measure, or some other flimsy political cover. Regardless, the degradation of the currency gained speed and, systematically, it’s been all downhill since.
We the people are no longer content with a free-market system that embraces periodically burning down the house in order to rebuild stronger and better – a system which has been proven to create wealth, and lots of it. Instead, we are hell bent on adopting the closed economic system of a socialist model where everything and everyone is tightly controlled.
On that point, an article in today’s edition of the Wall Street Journal titled “No Exit in Sight for U.S. as Fannie, Freddie Flail” sheds light on the continuing degradation in the free market that used to underpin the nation’s hugely important housing sector… Fannie and Freddie, for their part, remain at the core of a housing-finance system that inflated a dangerous housing bubble. After prices collapsed, sending shock waves around the world, the federal government put America's housing-finance system on life support. It has yet to decide how that troubled system should be rebuilt.
On Dec. 24, Treasury said there would be no limit to the taxpayer money it was willing to deploy over the next three years to keep the two companies afloat, doing away with the previous limit of $200 billion per company. So far, the government has handed the two companies a total of about $111 billion.
The government is willing to tolerate such open-ended exposure for two reasons. First, it sees the companies as essential cogs in the fragile housing market. Fannie and Freddie buy mortgages originated by others, holding some as investments and repackaging others for sale to investors as securities. Together with the Federal Housing Administration, they fund nine in 10 American mortgages. Worries about potential insolvency would cripple their ability to fund home loans, which would hamstring the market.
Second, the companies are a convenient tool for the administration to use in its campaign to clean up the housing mess. "We're making decisions on [loan modifications] and other issues, without being guided solely by profitability, that no purely private bank ever could," Mr. Haldeman said in late January in a speech to the Detroit Economic Club.
Besides playing a key role in the loan-modification program, Fannie and Freddie have jump-started lending by state and local housing-finance agencies by helping to guarantee $24 billion in debt. They also are lending support to the apartment sector by becoming the main funders of loans to builders and buyers of apartment buildings.
By using Fannie and Freddie for such initiatives, the White House doesn't have to go to Congress for funding. The Treasury and White House can simply issue instructions to Fannie and Freddie via their federal regulator, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, or FHFA.
The government is "running Fannie and Freddie as an instrument of national economic policy, not as a business," says Daniel Mudd, who was forced out as Fannie Mae's chief executive in September 2008 when the government took control.
(Full story here.)
Can’t you just smell the entropy? The results are not just predictable, they are evident – just look around.
As investors, it is, I would contend, important to understand the notion of entropy – and to watch for it in your portfolio companies, in your bureaucracies, and, on a more personal level, your relationships and your health. On that last point, the human body is very much a closed system and so, as we all are too painfully aware, will degrade until it ceases to exist.
You can slow the degradation by taking care of yourself. But it’s also worth remembering that it’s a one-way slope, so enjoy yourself while you are fit and able to.
======================================
Provided by Casey's Daily Dispatch
Showing posts with label Capital Markets. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Capital Markets. Show all posts
Wednesday, February 10, 2010
Friday, January 29, 2010
Banks Can No Longer Sing "What a Friend We Have in Washington"
These days, the financial industry's locus of power can't be found in London. It's not in New York City. Frankfurt? Tokyo? Davos, Switzerland? Nope, nope, and nope.
The real decisions that impact the capital markets are being made in Washington. And they're sometimes being made by politicians who don't really have a clue about how the industry works, or what unintended consequences their actions may have. If that doesn't scare you, I don't know what will.
Look no further than last week's market carnage for proof of who's in charge. The market was continuing on its merry way — until Washington lobbed several curve balls at Wall Street.
The reaction was swift and severe: The overall market suffered its biggest hit in months, with financial stocks getting hammered particularly hard. Moreover, the "VIX" index of volatility surged 55 percent in a span of three days. We haven't seen a move that large, that quickly since 2007.
It's clear to me that the political tides are shifting for the financial industry — and not in a good way. This could have widespread implications for the markets I follow most closely, so I want to expand on some key points.
Bankers No Longer Free to Run Wild?
President Obama shocked the markets last week with a new plan designed to rein in the nation's banks. It would specifically bar banks from holding or investing in private equity and hedge funds that aren't related to customers they're serving. Banks also would have to shed so-called "proprietary trading" units that use their own capital to place bets on the market.
Combined, these moves could impact companies like JPMorgan. It runs a OneEquity Partners PE unit that makes $8 billion in investments. It could also hammer prop trading houses like Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, which generate billions of dollars in revenue from such activities.
President Obama has shocked the markets with a plan to rein in the nation's banks.
In the bigger picture, as Martin noted earlier, this signals that the "Bailout Brigade" of Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner and Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke may be losing influence. The outrageous behavior of Wall Street firms and the banking industry — and Washington's coddling of them — have finally pushed average Americans over the edge.
They're sick of watching companies make stupid loans, arrange stupid deals, blow themselves up, take billions of dollars in taxpayer money, and then — in a move that defies all logic, morality, and sensitivity — turn around and pay themselves billions and billions in bonuses! So they're rising up in anger and trying to "vote the bums out."
Result: The policymakers in Washington are finally being forced to listen to the masses — and the bankers and their lobbyists are running scared. So are bank investors, who have grown accustomed to a steady diet of D.C. handouts.
FHA Tightening the Screws?
Change is also afoot in the housing and mortgage arenas. The Federal Housing Administration, or FHA, has been making overly lax loans for several quarters now — even as house prices fall and defaults rise. Its credit reserves are running at the lowest level in modern history, raising the risk of yet another massive bailout.
But in an about-face from the recent trend toward blindly marching off a cliff, this federally-backed mortgage lender is tightening the screws. It plans to soon implement higher down payment requirements for borrowers with lousy credit.
It's also jacking up the upfront premium borrowers have to pay into the program from 1.75 percent to 2.25 percent of the loan balance. Those premiums fund insurance that protects lenders for losses on FHA loans. Finally, FHA will ask Congress for authority to raise the monthly premiums that borrowers have to shell out along with their regular payments.
A few years ago, when the FHA program was a seldom-used option for mortgage borrowers, something like this would hardly matter. But FHA now guarantees roughly 3-in-10 of all mortgages being made. So its move could be significant.
At the same time, the administration isn't entirely cutting off the housing and mortgage industries — or borrowers, for that matter. Reports are now circulating that the Obama team will soon revamp either its $300 billion Hope for Homeowners (H4H) program or the larger Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP). We may even see changes in both.
These programs are designed to reduce foreclosures through the use of loan modifications, or "mods." But they've failed to significantly — and permanently — stem the flood of home repossessions because they don't aggressively attack the "negative equity" problem.
Efforts are underway to reduce foreclosures through the use of loan modifications.
What do I mean? These days, borrowers who go to their lenders or the government for help typically get their interest rates cut, their loan terms extended, and/or their monthly payments lowered. But their lenders don't cut the amount of principal they owe.
That leaves borrowers owing, say, $450,000 on a house that was once worth $500,000 but now is worth just $300,000. The question isn't "Why WOULD you just mail the keys back to your lender?" in that situation. It's "Why WOULDN'T you?" Even if home prices immediately turn around and start rising at their historical rate of a few percentage points a year, it would take ages for you to build positive equity again.
I highlighted this as a critical flaw of the Obama plan almost a year ago in Money and Markets when I wrote: "Higher loan-to-value ratio mortgages have ALWAYS had higher default rates than lower LTV ones. Why? When borrowers have none of their money at risk — skin in the game, if you will — they have no vested interest in sticking with the property. They're giving up nothing by walking away.
"Sure, they'll take the lower payments they're going to be offered as part of the Obama modification plan. Sure, they'll stick around for a while. But if anything ... anything ... throws their financial situation off balance, a high percentage of them will resort to "jingle mail" — meaning, they'll pop their keys in an envelope and send it off to their lender"
Because neither H4H nor HAMP has lived up to expectations, the political pressure on the administration is reaching a tipping point. And if the administration responds by fixing that crucial "principal reduction" flaw, it would be a big deal. It would be a significant step toward lowering the foreclosure rate and helping out the housing market.
The Impact on You
So what does this all mean for you, especially if you're investing in financial stocks or bonds and related industries? You simply can't be as bullish on them as you were when Washington was their best friend.
Policy is no longer being written by a bunch of bank lobbyists, then rubberstamped by the Wall Street cronies in Congress and on the Obama administration's financial team. That's good news for the long-term health of the country ... but a potential chink in the armor for the markets, especially financial stocks.
At the same time, the nasty knee-jerk market reaction last week could scare policymakers right back into bailout mode. If stocks roll over ... if home sales continue to slow (as opposed to just suffer a post-tax-cut hangover for a month or two) ... and if mortgage credit tightens anew, the Bailout Brigade might be rolled right back out again.
What is certain is that volatility and confusion levels among investors will rise. So while it's not exactly time to go all-in short here, or dump all your "longs," it IS time to pare back your exposure, take some gains off the table, and let positions that get stopped out stay that way. Then we'll see how this all shakes out.
========================================
This investment news is brought to you by Money and Markets. Money and Markets is a free daily investment newsletter from Martin D. Weiss and Weiss Research analysts offering the latest investing news and financial insights for the stock market, including tips and advice on investing in gold, energy and oil. Dr. Weiss is a leader in the fields of investing, interest rates, financial safety and economic forecasting. To view archives or subscribe, visit http://www.moneyandmarkets.com.
The real decisions that impact the capital markets are being made in Washington. And they're sometimes being made by politicians who don't really have a clue about how the industry works, or what unintended consequences their actions may have. If that doesn't scare you, I don't know what will.
Look no further than last week's market carnage for proof of who's in charge. The market was continuing on its merry way — until Washington lobbed several curve balls at Wall Street.
The reaction was swift and severe: The overall market suffered its biggest hit in months, with financial stocks getting hammered particularly hard. Moreover, the "VIX" index of volatility surged 55 percent in a span of three days. We haven't seen a move that large, that quickly since 2007.
It's clear to me that the political tides are shifting for the financial industry — and not in a good way. This could have widespread implications for the markets I follow most closely, so I want to expand on some key points.
Bankers No Longer Free to Run Wild?
President Obama shocked the markets last week with a new plan designed to rein in the nation's banks. It would specifically bar banks from holding or investing in private equity and hedge funds that aren't related to customers they're serving. Banks also would have to shed so-called "proprietary trading" units that use their own capital to place bets on the market.
Combined, these moves could impact companies like JPMorgan. It runs a OneEquity Partners PE unit that makes $8 billion in investments. It could also hammer prop trading houses like Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, which generate billions of dollars in revenue from such activities.
President Obama has shocked the markets with a plan to rein in the nation's banks.
In the bigger picture, as Martin noted earlier, this signals that the "Bailout Brigade" of Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner and Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke may be losing influence. The outrageous behavior of Wall Street firms and the banking industry — and Washington's coddling of them — have finally pushed average Americans over the edge.
They're sick of watching companies make stupid loans, arrange stupid deals, blow themselves up, take billions of dollars in taxpayer money, and then — in a move that defies all logic, morality, and sensitivity — turn around and pay themselves billions and billions in bonuses! So they're rising up in anger and trying to "vote the bums out."
Result: The policymakers in Washington are finally being forced to listen to the masses — and the bankers and their lobbyists are running scared. So are bank investors, who have grown accustomed to a steady diet of D.C. handouts.
FHA Tightening the Screws?
Change is also afoot in the housing and mortgage arenas. The Federal Housing Administration, or FHA, has been making overly lax loans for several quarters now — even as house prices fall and defaults rise. Its credit reserves are running at the lowest level in modern history, raising the risk of yet another massive bailout.
But in an about-face from the recent trend toward blindly marching off a cliff, this federally-backed mortgage lender is tightening the screws. It plans to soon implement higher down payment requirements for borrowers with lousy credit.
It's also jacking up the upfront premium borrowers have to pay into the program from 1.75 percent to 2.25 percent of the loan balance. Those premiums fund insurance that protects lenders for losses on FHA loans. Finally, FHA will ask Congress for authority to raise the monthly premiums that borrowers have to shell out along with their regular payments.
A few years ago, when the FHA program was a seldom-used option for mortgage borrowers, something like this would hardly matter. But FHA now guarantees roughly 3-in-10 of all mortgages being made. So its move could be significant.
At the same time, the administration isn't entirely cutting off the housing and mortgage industries — or borrowers, for that matter. Reports are now circulating that the Obama team will soon revamp either its $300 billion Hope for Homeowners (H4H) program or the larger Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP). We may even see changes in both.
These programs are designed to reduce foreclosures through the use of loan modifications, or "mods." But they've failed to significantly — and permanently — stem the flood of home repossessions because they don't aggressively attack the "negative equity" problem.
Efforts are underway to reduce foreclosures through the use of loan modifications.
What do I mean? These days, borrowers who go to their lenders or the government for help typically get their interest rates cut, their loan terms extended, and/or their monthly payments lowered. But their lenders don't cut the amount of principal they owe.
That leaves borrowers owing, say, $450,000 on a house that was once worth $500,000 but now is worth just $300,000. The question isn't "Why WOULD you just mail the keys back to your lender?" in that situation. It's "Why WOULDN'T you?" Even if home prices immediately turn around and start rising at their historical rate of a few percentage points a year, it would take ages for you to build positive equity again.
I highlighted this as a critical flaw of the Obama plan almost a year ago in Money and Markets when I wrote: "Higher loan-to-value ratio mortgages have ALWAYS had higher default rates than lower LTV ones. Why? When borrowers have none of their money at risk — skin in the game, if you will — they have no vested interest in sticking with the property. They're giving up nothing by walking away.
"Sure, they'll take the lower payments they're going to be offered as part of the Obama modification plan. Sure, they'll stick around for a while. But if anything ... anything ... throws their financial situation off balance, a high percentage of them will resort to "jingle mail" — meaning, they'll pop their keys in an envelope and send it off to their lender"
Because neither H4H nor HAMP has lived up to expectations, the political pressure on the administration is reaching a tipping point. And if the administration responds by fixing that crucial "principal reduction" flaw, it would be a big deal. It would be a significant step toward lowering the foreclosure rate and helping out the housing market.
The Impact on You
So what does this all mean for you, especially if you're investing in financial stocks or bonds and related industries? You simply can't be as bullish on them as you were when Washington was their best friend.
Policy is no longer being written by a bunch of bank lobbyists, then rubberstamped by the Wall Street cronies in Congress and on the Obama administration's financial team. That's good news for the long-term health of the country ... but a potential chink in the armor for the markets, especially financial stocks.
At the same time, the nasty knee-jerk market reaction last week could scare policymakers right back into bailout mode. If stocks roll over ... if home sales continue to slow (as opposed to just suffer a post-tax-cut hangover for a month or two) ... and if mortgage credit tightens anew, the Bailout Brigade might be rolled right back out again.
What is certain is that volatility and confusion levels among investors will rise. So while it's not exactly time to go all-in short here, or dump all your "longs," it IS time to pare back your exposure, take some gains off the table, and let positions that get stopped out stay that way. Then we'll see how this all shakes out.
========================================
This investment news is brought to you by Money and Markets. Money and Markets is a free daily investment newsletter from Martin D. Weiss and Weiss Research analysts offering the latest investing news and financial insights for the stock market, including tips and advice on investing in gold, energy and oil. Dr. Weiss is a leader in the fields of investing, interest rates, financial safety and economic forecasting. To view archives or subscribe, visit http://www.moneyandmarkets.com.
Friday, April 17, 2009
Economy Booming Again? Seriously?
It's hard to find anyone who's still bearish on the economy or the market these days. Listen to the average pundit on CNBC and this is what you'll hear:
-The credit crisis? It's over! Quit worrying.
-The real estate mess? Fixed! No problem.
-The economy? Rebounding. The worst is behind us.
-The markets? They're headed to infinity and beyond! Better get on board.
I've talked about the credit crisis a few times. And no less an authority than the International Monetary Fund (IMF) believes we've only acknowledged $1.29 trillion of the $4 trillion in total global credit losses to date. That means we're not even a THIRD of the way through the process.
In the real estate arena, we're seeing tentative signs of life in some hard-hit markets. But it's the distressed, "fire sale" stuff that's moving. Inventory levels remain high, and foreclosures show no sign of abating. In fact, foreclosure filings hit a new record high of 341,000 in March — a gain driven by rising unemployment, falling home prices, and the expiration of several, temporary state and industry moratoriums.
And that's just on the RESIDENTIAL front!
The COMMERCIAL real estate business is in full-scale meltdown mode. Prices are plunging, vacancies are soaring, and rents are dropping. Office tenants recently vacated a whopping 24.9 million square feet of space, the most since the 9/11 attacks. And General Growth Properties, the second-biggest mall operator in the U.S., just filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. The company is buried under $27 billion in debt, and its bankruptcy is the largest EVER seen in the commercial real estate industry.
It's (still) the Economy, Stupid!
But it's the economy that could be the weakest link here. Several companies have come out and said that business isn't getting any worse. Some of the earnings reports I've read talk about how conditions are now simply horrendous, rather than Armageddon-like.
But does that mean things are getting better? Is the economy really ramping up? Is the worst really behind us? I find that hard to believe. Just consider what we learned this week ...
The consumer is still on the ropes! Retail sales plunged 1.1 percent in March. That was a huge swing from the 0.3 percent gain in February, and much worse than forecast.
No matter how you slice and dice the numbers (exclude autos, exclude gas, etc.), you still come to the same conclusion: The consumer is on the ropes and not in the mood to blow his dwindling paycheck at the mall. That's unlikely to change anytime soon, not with the level of continuing jobless claims now running at more than 6 MILLION — the highest in U.S. history.
Factories are sitting idle! Industrial production dropped 1.5 percent in March. That was far worse than the 0.9 percent dip that was expected and the 14th decline in the past 15 months. Capacity utilization — the amount of available space that's actually being used — fell to 69.3 percent. That's the lowest level in the 42 years the government has been keeping track!
Deflation is far from dead! The Federal Reserve has been pumping money into the economy like mad to offset deflation. But so far, it doesn't seem to be working out that well. The Producer Price Index (PPI) dropped 1.2 percent last month, much worse than the forecast for a flat reading.
On a year-over-year basis, wholesale prices are now falling at a 3.5 percent rate. That's the deepest rate of deflation recorded in this country since January 1950! In addition, consumer-level deflation came in at 0.4 percent, the most since 1955.
Garden Variety Recession ... Or Something Else?
Many Wall Street investors are operating under the assumption that this is a garden variety recession. They're saying that the modicum of "less worse" news we've seen is a harbinger of "recovery." They expect consumer spending to resume its normal pace, factories to ramp production back up, and everything to be hunky dory by year end.
But if this is a much deeper economic decline ... one driven by the biggest bout of debt destruction and deleveraging this country has seen since the Great Depression ... that's a different story. In that case, the Fed's reflation efforts will fail. At best, the economy will muddle along. At worst, it will slip even further down the rabbit hole. And stocks will ultimately head lower.
I don't have a perfect crystal ball. But I believe the risk of a Japan-style economic stagnation is much higher than the traditional Wall Street pundit thinks it is. And I believe this recent rally smells more like the bear market variety — very sharp, relatively short-lived, and ultimately, doomed to fail. So I most certainly wouldn't be chasing it.
Until next time…
This investment news is brought to you by Money and Markets. Money and Markets is a free daily investment newsletter from Martin D. Weiss and Weiss Research analysts offering the latest investing news and financial insights for the stock market, including tips and advice on investing in gold, energy and oil. Dr. Weiss is a leader in the fields of investing, interest rates, financial safety and economic forecasting. To view archives or subscribe, visit http://www.moneyandmarkets.com.
-The credit crisis? It's over! Quit worrying.
-The real estate mess? Fixed! No problem.
-The economy? Rebounding. The worst is behind us.
-The markets? They're headed to infinity and beyond! Better get on board.
I've talked about the credit crisis a few times. And no less an authority than the International Monetary Fund (IMF) believes we've only acknowledged $1.29 trillion of the $4 trillion in total global credit losses to date. That means we're not even a THIRD of the way through the process.
In the real estate arena, we're seeing tentative signs of life in some hard-hit markets. But it's the distressed, "fire sale" stuff that's moving. Inventory levels remain high, and foreclosures show no sign of abating. In fact, foreclosure filings hit a new record high of 341,000 in March — a gain driven by rising unemployment, falling home prices, and the expiration of several, temporary state and industry moratoriums.
And that's just on the RESIDENTIAL front!
The COMMERCIAL real estate business is in full-scale meltdown mode. Prices are plunging, vacancies are soaring, and rents are dropping. Office tenants recently vacated a whopping 24.9 million square feet of space, the most since the 9/11 attacks. And General Growth Properties, the second-biggest mall operator in the U.S., just filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. The company is buried under $27 billion in debt, and its bankruptcy is the largest EVER seen in the commercial real estate industry.
It's (still) the Economy, Stupid!
But it's the economy that could be the weakest link here. Several companies have come out and said that business isn't getting any worse. Some of the earnings reports I've read talk about how conditions are now simply horrendous, rather than Armageddon-like.
But does that mean things are getting better? Is the economy really ramping up? Is the worst really behind us? I find that hard to believe. Just consider what we learned this week ...
The consumer is still on the ropes! Retail sales plunged 1.1 percent in March. That was a huge swing from the 0.3 percent gain in February, and much worse than forecast.
No matter how you slice and dice the numbers (exclude autos, exclude gas, etc.), you still come to the same conclusion: The consumer is on the ropes and not in the mood to blow his dwindling paycheck at the mall. That's unlikely to change anytime soon, not with the level of continuing jobless claims now running at more than 6 MILLION — the highest in U.S. history.
Factories are sitting idle! Industrial production dropped 1.5 percent in March. That was far worse than the 0.9 percent dip that was expected and the 14th decline in the past 15 months. Capacity utilization — the amount of available space that's actually being used — fell to 69.3 percent. That's the lowest level in the 42 years the government has been keeping track!
Deflation is far from dead! The Federal Reserve has been pumping money into the economy like mad to offset deflation. But so far, it doesn't seem to be working out that well. The Producer Price Index (PPI) dropped 1.2 percent last month, much worse than the forecast for a flat reading.
On a year-over-year basis, wholesale prices are now falling at a 3.5 percent rate. That's the deepest rate of deflation recorded in this country since January 1950! In addition, consumer-level deflation came in at 0.4 percent, the most since 1955.
Garden Variety Recession ... Or Something Else?
Many Wall Street investors are operating under the assumption that this is a garden variety recession. They're saying that the modicum of "less worse" news we've seen is a harbinger of "recovery." They expect consumer spending to resume its normal pace, factories to ramp production back up, and everything to be hunky dory by year end.
But if this is a much deeper economic decline ... one driven by the biggest bout of debt destruction and deleveraging this country has seen since the Great Depression ... that's a different story. In that case, the Fed's reflation efforts will fail. At best, the economy will muddle along. At worst, it will slip even further down the rabbit hole. And stocks will ultimately head lower.
I don't have a perfect crystal ball. But I believe the risk of a Japan-style economic stagnation is much higher than the traditional Wall Street pundit thinks it is. And I believe this recent rally smells more like the bear market variety — very sharp, relatively short-lived, and ultimately, doomed to fail. So I most certainly wouldn't be chasing it.
Until next time…
This investment news is brought to you by Money and Markets. Money and Markets is a free daily investment newsletter from Martin D. Weiss and Weiss Research analysts offering the latest investing news and financial insights for the stock market, including tips and advice on investing in gold, energy and oil. Dr. Weiss is a leader in the fields of investing, interest rates, financial safety and economic forecasting. To view archives or subscribe, visit http://www.moneyandmarkets.com.
Tuesday, April 1, 2008
Real Estate and the Credit Crunch Update 2008
The Current Affairs of the Real Estate & Capital Markets
by Rob E. Lee
All trees aspire to grow to the sky; likewise during a boom market the human spirit cannot believe that there will be an ultimate bust. As last year drew to a close the investment environment transitioned from cautious optimism to a heightened level of realization that there was a global credit crisis brewing in the financial markets.
Today, the commercial real estate market has entered a period of declining values, or as any would say "correcting values" in an effort to adjust the risk basis. Many properties are overleveraged or encountering financial difficulty. The collapse of the housing market coupled with fuel and food price inflation are putting tremendous strain on the American consumer, the ultimate driver of our economy.
Hidden behind the creative genius and financially engineered products that drove much of the aggressive view that the economy could do no wrong during the last decade, Wall Street and Main Street have been oversold, especially with respect to securitized single-family residential debt products, or subprime loans. In fact, the housing market was overleveraged more than anyone realized, or even suspected, relative to the fundamental values of the underlying residential assets.
According to Jack Cohen, CEO of Cohen Financial, a leading commercial real estate investment bank, a massive real estate resetting and de-leveraging is occurring during this first quarter of 2008. Some say it is due directly to sub-prime and single family housing troubles. Mr. Cohen says this is not entirely true. The commercial and residential markets are not linked but for three items: 1) space demand is linked by the health of the economy; 2) lending is linked through the capital markets; and, 3) bond pricing is linked through the investor base (supporting the capital markets). Otherwise, no other links exist. Commercial and residential issues are not at all intertwined. "None of the flaws in the sub-prime business model are remotely present in the commercial real estate lending business. To the contrary, the strengths of the commercial real estate lending business model were not present in the sub-prime business model," stated Cohen.
As the residential market's weakness increased in 2007, the commercial real estate market reached its pinnacle to date, with mega multi-billion portfolio deals such as the Blackstone Group and Equity Office Properties (EOP) Trust transaction. When the cracks in the foundation of the credit markets appeared as a result of the subprime mortgage market meltdown, the commercial real estate market took notice and quickly inventoried its own aggressive dealings and pricing during the past five years. Risk aversion quaked throughout the world's credit markets, resulting in the Federal Reserve pumping liquidity into the financial markets and dropping the federal funds rate. The world and domestic commercial real estate investors prepared for new terrain.
The Federal Reserve created the perfect environment and many lenders detached risk from reward in a market where more money was made securitizing the loans rather than holding them. Demand for securitized loans forced lenders to sacrifice underwriting standards and reengineer loan products such as interest-only loans and low or no debt-service coverage requirements. Financing at all levels of the capital stack created more asset demand. Cap-rate compression happened quickly, falling from 11% in 1995 on average to 6.29% in June 2007. Without leverage, investors would demand a higher return.
In the wider marketplace, the subprime debacle has ensnared some of the biggest institutions on Wall Street. Write-downs at Merrill Lynch totaled $22 billion by mid-January, and Citigroup wrote off $20 billion. Citigroup Chairman Charles Prince and Merrill Lynch CEO Stan O'Neal resigned. Even mortgage financiers Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, stalwarts of the secondary mortgage market, face potential write-downs of $16 billion for the fourth quarter of 2007 because of flawed subprime loans and other investments.
The threat of recession is also taking a toll on the market, further shaking the confidence of bond buyers and sellers. The Federal Reserve's startling, 75 basis point cut in interest rates on Jan. 22 - the largest reduction in more than two decades - quieted turbulent stock markets momentarily, but raised new questions.
"While it's meant to stabilize things, that to me are going to make people more nervous," says Kim Diamond, managing director at Standard & Poor's, since it signals the Fed's deep concern over the economy. "A 75 basis point cut off-cycle is pretty extreme."
Despite a slowdown in 2007's growth rate, the U.S. economy remains resilient beyond most expectations - but that is what keeps market nerves on edge while providing a much-needed stable market influence. Fortunately the global economy is on solid footing and is expected to grow at a faster pace, helping the U.S. weather this slow domestic economic picture.
For borrowers, the call to action is to proceed cautiously and creatively, rather than sit on the sidelines. Forget about an attempt to convince a lender to be "aggressive" or "creative" when financing your next real estate deal. Banks have gone back to basics - solid fundamentals, and nothing less will do.
Although inflation pressures probably will continue in 2008, the Federal Reserve has shown its willingness to accommodate the markets by lowering interest rates and injecting liquidity into the economy to help avoid a recession. Unemployment remains low, but with the continuing housing slump and high energy prices, consumer spending and job growth may slow. Strong employment will favor commercial real estate, keeping vacancies low and providing the necessary support for investment earnings. However, geographic differences in commercial investment markets will play a pivotal role, as some U.S. regions have seen variations in their local economies.
Unstable financial market realities favor commercial real estate. As the financial markets become riskier and less attractive, commercial real estate - as long as it holds its own - becomes more attractive on a relative basis. It does not mean that prices continue to climb, but commercial real estate does maintain a more attractive position relative to stocks and bonds . With average yield rates on commercial real estate investments still higher than those for many other investment alternatives, commercial real estate likely will continue to be a preferred investment vehicle from a risk-adjusted basis. For example, National apartment fundamentals were strong during 2007, thanks to a great deal of help from the subprime lending fallout in the residential market. However, supply may begin to outpace demand, as unsold houses are rented and units slated for condominium conversion re-enter the market as rental units.
With continuing strength in overall commercial real estate fundamentals, it is no surprise that capital still is flowing into the market. However, the amount of funds has slowed, especially highly leveraged debt, and likely will continue to decrease this year. This trend will continue to affect asset pricing, working to move prices below the record-setting levels of the past year. This slow but steady downward movement should help to calm fears of overpricing in some markets.
Although we view debt capital as tightening the hatch and clearly as more discriminating and volatile, there is still an ample amount of debt capital to support the right level of financial leverage for commercial real estate. Further, there is plenty of equity capital from both domestic and foreign sources that is inclined to invest in commercial real estate.
2008: Markets to Watch
The following list of top 10 markets by property type is based on RERC's price/value analysis, which utilizes RERC's valuation expertise, market knowledge, and financial modeling capabilities to identify these markets.
Office Industrial Retail Multifamily
Salt Lake City Kansas City, KS Los Angeles Portland, OR
Austin, TX Sacramento Baltimore Austin, TX
Sacramento Seattle Minneapolis San Antonio
New York Dallas Cleveland Chicago
Cleveland San Diego Charlotte, NC Washington, DC
San Francisco Houston Philadelphia Norfolk, VA
Los Angeles Cleveland San Antonio Seattle
Seattle St. Louis Las Vegas Charlotte, NC
Denver Minneapolis Miami Denver
Portland, OR Los Angeles Sacramento, CA New York
Despite the psychological drama of the credit crunch - from tightening underwriting standards to the global stock market plunge on Jan. 21 - plenty of capital is still available for deals in the $20 million to $30 million range, the core industry size, brokers say. However, overleveraged property investors undoubtedly will face loan defaults, workouts or foreclosures. This is the downside of overleveraging assets in a cyclical business, which forces property owners to go through a detoxification process so that the lending cycle can begin anew.
Industry confidence can be regained if fear doesn't overtake rational decision-making. "We can talk ourselves into recession. If we continue to terrify ourselves, and let this drag out, then it's going to become a self-fulfilling prophecy," said Randy Reef, senior managing director of Bear Stearns, at the CMSA conference in Miami. The CMBS market was overheated and poised for a reversal, but losses can be kept tolerable, he maintains.
Many echo the thoughts of Jack Cohen, of Cohen Financial in that the industry doesn't need new or more capital. Rather, in 2008 we need old capital confident enough to invest. This is only possible if everyone stops pining for the easy lending days of 2006 and the first half of 2007 and accepts the new world we live in for what it really is-good for business! The dislocation of capital happened for technical reasons; let's not make this worse by eroding commercial real estate fundamentals. Accepting the shift is the fastest path to a new foundation of wealth creation. Capital is still plentiful for deals that make sense and real estate investment banks like Cohen Financial are still able to finance deals and provide capital for those buyers and sellers who realize the market is still full of opportunities.
About the Author
Rob E. Lee, M.B.A., CCIM
Senior Associate of Investment Properties for Colliers International's Private Capital Advisors Group in Los Angeles and is currently serving as the President for the Greater Southern California CCIM Chapter. He can be reached at Robert.Lee@Colliers.com or (310) 787-1000. He is a 2006 alumnus from the Graziadio School of Business and Management.
by Rob E. Lee
All trees aspire to grow to the sky; likewise during a boom market the human spirit cannot believe that there will be an ultimate bust. As last year drew to a close the investment environment transitioned from cautious optimism to a heightened level of realization that there was a global credit crisis brewing in the financial markets.
Today, the commercial real estate market has entered a period of declining values, or as any would say "correcting values" in an effort to adjust the risk basis. Many properties are overleveraged or encountering financial difficulty. The collapse of the housing market coupled with fuel and food price inflation are putting tremendous strain on the American consumer, the ultimate driver of our economy.
Hidden behind the creative genius and financially engineered products that drove much of the aggressive view that the economy could do no wrong during the last decade, Wall Street and Main Street have been oversold, especially with respect to securitized single-family residential debt products, or subprime loans. In fact, the housing market was overleveraged more than anyone realized, or even suspected, relative to the fundamental values of the underlying residential assets.
According to Jack Cohen, CEO of Cohen Financial, a leading commercial real estate investment bank, a massive real estate resetting and de-leveraging is occurring during this first quarter of 2008. Some say it is due directly to sub-prime and single family housing troubles. Mr. Cohen says this is not entirely true. The commercial and residential markets are not linked but for three items: 1) space demand is linked by the health of the economy; 2) lending is linked through the capital markets; and, 3) bond pricing is linked through the investor base (supporting the capital markets). Otherwise, no other links exist. Commercial and residential issues are not at all intertwined. "None of the flaws in the sub-prime business model are remotely present in the commercial real estate lending business. To the contrary, the strengths of the commercial real estate lending business model were not present in the sub-prime business model," stated Cohen.
As the residential market's weakness increased in 2007, the commercial real estate market reached its pinnacle to date, with mega multi-billion portfolio deals such as the Blackstone Group and Equity Office Properties (EOP) Trust transaction. When the cracks in the foundation of the credit markets appeared as a result of the subprime mortgage market meltdown, the commercial real estate market took notice and quickly inventoried its own aggressive dealings and pricing during the past five years. Risk aversion quaked throughout the world's credit markets, resulting in the Federal Reserve pumping liquidity into the financial markets and dropping the federal funds rate. The world and domestic commercial real estate investors prepared for new terrain.
The Federal Reserve created the perfect environment and many lenders detached risk from reward in a market where more money was made securitizing the loans rather than holding them. Demand for securitized loans forced lenders to sacrifice underwriting standards and reengineer loan products such as interest-only loans and low or no debt-service coverage requirements. Financing at all levels of the capital stack created more asset demand. Cap-rate compression happened quickly, falling from 11% in 1995 on average to 6.29% in June 2007. Without leverage, investors would demand a higher return.
In the wider marketplace, the subprime debacle has ensnared some of the biggest institutions on Wall Street. Write-downs at Merrill Lynch totaled $22 billion by mid-January, and Citigroup wrote off $20 billion. Citigroup Chairman Charles Prince and Merrill Lynch CEO Stan O'Neal resigned. Even mortgage financiers Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, stalwarts of the secondary mortgage market, face potential write-downs of $16 billion for the fourth quarter of 2007 because of flawed subprime loans and other investments.
The threat of recession is also taking a toll on the market, further shaking the confidence of bond buyers and sellers. The Federal Reserve's startling, 75 basis point cut in interest rates on Jan. 22 - the largest reduction in more than two decades - quieted turbulent stock markets momentarily, but raised new questions.
"While it's meant to stabilize things, that to me are going to make people more nervous," says Kim Diamond, managing director at Standard & Poor's, since it signals the Fed's deep concern over the economy. "A 75 basis point cut off-cycle is pretty extreme."
Despite a slowdown in 2007's growth rate, the U.S. economy remains resilient beyond most expectations - but that is what keeps market nerves on edge while providing a much-needed stable market influence. Fortunately the global economy is on solid footing and is expected to grow at a faster pace, helping the U.S. weather this slow domestic economic picture.
For borrowers, the call to action is to proceed cautiously and creatively, rather than sit on the sidelines. Forget about an attempt to convince a lender to be "aggressive" or "creative" when financing your next real estate deal. Banks have gone back to basics - solid fundamentals, and nothing less will do.
Although inflation pressures probably will continue in 2008, the Federal Reserve has shown its willingness to accommodate the markets by lowering interest rates and injecting liquidity into the economy to help avoid a recession. Unemployment remains low, but with the continuing housing slump and high energy prices, consumer spending and job growth may slow. Strong employment will favor commercial real estate, keeping vacancies low and providing the necessary support for investment earnings. However, geographic differences in commercial investment markets will play a pivotal role, as some U.S. regions have seen variations in their local economies.
Unstable financial market realities favor commercial real estate. As the financial markets become riskier and less attractive, commercial real estate - as long as it holds its own - becomes more attractive on a relative basis. It does not mean that prices continue to climb, but commercial real estate does maintain a more attractive position relative to stocks and bonds . With average yield rates on commercial real estate investments still higher than those for many other investment alternatives, commercial real estate likely will continue to be a preferred investment vehicle from a risk-adjusted basis. For example, National apartment fundamentals were strong during 2007, thanks to a great deal of help from the subprime lending fallout in the residential market. However, supply may begin to outpace demand, as unsold houses are rented and units slated for condominium conversion re-enter the market as rental units.
With continuing strength in overall commercial real estate fundamentals, it is no surprise that capital still is flowing into the market. However, the amount of funds has slowed, especially highly leveraged debt, and likely will continue to decrease this year. This trend will continue to affect asset pricing, working to move prices below the record-setting levels of the past year. This slow but steady downward movement should help to calm fears of overpricing in some markets.
Although we view debt capital as tightening the hatch and clearly as more discriminating and volatile, there is still an ample amount of debt capital to support the right level of financial leverage for commercial real estate. Further, there is plenty of equity capital from both domestic and foreign sources that is inclined to invest in commercial real estate.
2008: Markets to Watch
The following list of top 10 markets by property type is based on RERC's price/value analysis, which utilizes RERC's valuation expertise, market knowledge, and financial modeling capabilities to identify these markets.
Office Industrial Retail Multifamily
Salt Lake City Kansas City, KS Los Angeles Portland, OR
Austin, TX Sacramento Baltimore Austin, TX
Sacramento Seattle Minneapolis San Antonio
New York Dallas Cleveland Chicago
Cleveland San Diego Charlotte, NC Washington, DC
San Francisco Houston Philadelphia Norfolk, VA
Los Angeles Cleveland San Antonio Seattle
Seattle St. Louis Las Vegas Charlotte, NC
Denver Minneapolis Miami Denver
Portland, OR Los Angeles Sacramento, CA New York
Despite the psychological drama of the credit crunch - from tightening underwriting standards to the global stock market plunge on Jan. 21 - plenty of capital is still available for deals in the $20 million to $30 million range, the core industry size, brokers say. However, overleveraged property investors undoubtedly will face loan defaults, workouts or foreclosures. This is the downside of overleveraging assets in a cyclical business, which forces property owners to go through a detoxification process so that the lending cycle can begin anew.
Industry confidence can be regained if fear doesn't overtake rational decision-making. "We can talk ourselves into recession. If we continue to terrify ourselves, and let this drag out, then it's going to become a self-fulfilling prophecy," said Randy Reef, senior managing director of Bear Stearns, at the CMSA conference in Miami. The CMBS market was overheated and poised for a reversal, but losses can be kept tolerable, he maintains.
Many echo the thoughts of Jack Cohen, of Cohen Financial in that the industry doesn't need new or more capital. Rather, in 2008 we need old capital confident enough to invest. This is only possible if everyone stops pining for the easy lending days of 2006 and the first half of 2007 and accepts the new world we live in for what it really is-good for business! The dislocation of capital happened for technical reasons; let's not make this worse by eroding commercial real estate fundamentals. Accepting the shift is the fastest path to a new foundation of wealth creation. Capital is still plentiful for deals that make sense and real estate investment banks like Cohen Financial are still able to finance deals and provide capital for those buyers and sellers who realize the market is still full of opportunities.
About the Author
Rob E. Lee, M.B.A., CCIM
Senior Associate of Investment Properties for Colliers International's Private Capital Advisors Group in Los Angeles and is currently serving as the President for the Greater Southern California CCIM Chapter. He can be reached at Robert.Lee@Colliers.com or (310) 787-1000. He is a 2006 alumnus from the Graziadio School of Business and Management.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)